It is widely seen that the visitors have to pay money for some museum entrance while the fraction of other do not have any entrance fee. I personally believed that the merits of admission charge preponderate its demerits. The reasons will be given in the following essay.
Some advantages can be gained by taking an entrance fee from the visitors. To begin with, this budget is allocated to refurbish of museums or to renovation of tools. Although the states are responsible for protection and reconstruction of those, the governments’ budget is not adequate. On account of this, ticket money for museums entrance is necessary fot their maintanence. And also, it is crutial for not only repairing of museums but also staff cost. Another benefit is that museums having admission charge are more educational than others. It is true that humankind are prone to being mutualist when they spend their money on anything. Because of this, they want to benefit from places they visit. To exemplify, when my brother charge for a museum admission, he read all information and he spend his much time in there. In addition to these, these museums attract interested people and unrelated people who damage museums’ artefact can be kept away. Therefore, museums are protected more.
The disadvantage of entrance fee should not be ignored. The major drawback is that ticket fee discourage people notably students, low-income families to enter museums. The advent of technological devices, archeologists can discover some materials easily, today. Thus, as long as the collection of museums are increasing day by day, the need of regular visiting goes up ,theoretically. Unfortunately, mentioned people cannot afford it.
To conclude, although entrance fee has a dire consequence in terms of discouraging people to go to museums, the benefits of it outweih its drawback. Ticket money have to be for museums’ repearing, salary of staff. Additionally, it stimulates individualts to receive an education regarding visited museum’s history.
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 802, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...mission, he read all information and he spend his much time in there. In addition to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., low-income families to enter museums. The advent of technological devices, archeo...
^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ay, the need of regular visiting goes up ,theoretically. Unfortunately, mentioned ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36335403727 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08712054503 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3624455401 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6363636364 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259782245518 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709297531878 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518323108775 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153271590306 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076675087126 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.