Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
Should history stand in the way of progress?
In modern times, people are interested in the modernization of all parts of life. Some people believe that the historical buildings, which are under the protection of law, should be reconstructed in order to modernize them. This essay will show the importance of these buildings and provide some arguments that they have beneficial for our progression.
Generally speaking, there is a wide range of reasons why the existence of monumental building is extremely important for us. Perhaps the main reason why people are in favour of this is because these buildings reflect our past. Today, there are countries which have thousands of years old history. These countries allow their people to know their cultural backgrounds. People in these countries teach the history to the children and also these children will teach that to their children. As a result, these cultural recollections can become a cultural heritage. Furthermore, this approach may provide the cultural and national integrity to people. Secondly, the areas where historical buildings stand give some opportunity to local people to earn money. These people usually depend on the money which they earned from the tourism revenue. If these buildings will be replaced by new buildings, it is highly likely that they might face with money issues and stop running their businesses. Furthermore, they will probably have to leave from their homes to find a job.
There are also benefits of historical structures to the modern world. Some people claim that these monuments cannot help the development progress of us. Whereas, in most modern country, the sewage systems have been designed by using the Roman’s designs, which the Romans had gained the knowledge to design it. This is a good illustration why the history gives us opportunity to move forward and improve our knowledge.
In conclusion, the idea that modernization of the historical buildings is a topic which is very relevant to modern society. However, I believe that these buildings and the historical heritage provided by them have undeniably positive effects on the world and people. If humans had not had a sense of the cultural integrity, our kind might not have existed in today as developed as we are.
- New technologies provided machines which replaced workers to do certain physical jobs and tasks. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- New technologies provided machines which replaced workers to do certain physical jobs and tasks. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people believe that having access to the internet is necessary to live a full life today To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world.What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2243767313 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76604137276 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520775623269 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2797011405 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.8095238095 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1904761905 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20248770298 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059399060148 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471980406655 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119280412805 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670196074556 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.