In many parts of the world, there is not enough food for everyone. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest?
The lack of enough food has been one of a fundamental problem. Nowadays food production is sufficient in many areas of the globe, particularly in underdeveloped countries. This essay will first suggest several significant reasons result in this event and then argue the government’s role as the most viable solutions.
There are some important causes of the food shortage in worldwide, which could threaten the life of millions of people. Firstly, food production has kept pace with the growth rate of population, and many countries of the world are currently experiencing the increasing population in their urban and rural regions. As a result, this lead to famine and starvation in most parts of the world such as Africa. According to official statistics from the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), 13% of the world’s people are hunger. In addition, the adequacy of productive farming lands and the use of old agricultural systems can be counted as other major reasons. This means less food is being produced. To put it simply, the use of out-to-date equipment of agriculture for activities: planting, harvesting and irrigation has risen the required time of producing more food. To summarize, unless we consider the mentioned causes, we could be faced with a serious food crisis.
In terms of solutions, I believe the government of the endangered countries should act responsibly to overcome this problem. In general, it is vital the state provides food requirements of all its citizen. Initially, all potential sources of agriculture, for example farms, facilities and laborers, should be evaluated by the local authority, which this measure will specify the immediate need to supply food through import duties. Following this, the government ought to invest more money for using the mentioned sources and importing up-to-date farming tools. Research shows that the expansion of artificial irrigation systems makes possible the growth of 40% of producing food. In a word, the state needs to create sustainable, competitive and diverse farming as it contribute to supply enough food.
In conclusion, the growing population, the shortage of productive farms and outdated agricultural systems usage are the foremost factors we face and it will be possible to deal with not enough food by planning, investment and the essential measures of the government. It is predicted that many part of the world will be forced to take necessity actions to provide sufficient food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 770, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contributes'?
Suggestion: contributes
..., competitive and diverse farming as it contribute to supply enough food. In conclusi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'systems'' or 'system's'?
Suggestion: systems'; system's
...ductive farms and outdated agricultural systems usage are the foremost factors we face ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 290, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun part seems to be countable; consider using: 'many parts'.
Suggestion: many parts
...of the government. It is predicted that many part of the world will be forced to take nec...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36641221374 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01586298748 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554707379135 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7240240752 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20319223116 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654978415362 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289926664403 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12782663596 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222280719153 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.