Many people across the world believe in that the formal pen + paper examination are not the best method of assessing educational achievement
Many people across the world believe in that the formal pen + paper examination are not the best method of assessing educational achievement. However, the formal pen + paper examinations are still important part of the educational evaluations as well as other methods of assessing plays a vital role in educational system.
The formal test pen paper does not test all they have learned, time might not be enough and it’s not testing their creativity. Each person has different skills and capabilities, some students might not do well on the day of the exam because of their anxiety for example: some students will perform better at orally exam than in formal paper pen exam also there are students that they could perform better in the formal exam pen paper than in orally exam. In spite all, the formal pen paper exams are the most popular methods of check because of the way of testing the students.
There are some advantages like: fairness, there is fairness because all students have the same type of test and the same amount of time it’s equal and the all material which have learned might be covered, it’s easy to administer and it’s efficient. In conclusion, writing exams are not the most superior way of evaluating what we have learn during the course because these test do not evaluate other aspects. It’s recommended that variety of tests should be used to assess students. Moreover, teachers need to find out what type of test is suitable each student.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-23 | Martin9604 | 56 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists. 56
- In some countries people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing and starting university studies. 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology 89
- The flow chary illustrates the consequences of deforestation. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...superior way of evaluating what we have learn during the course because these test do...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52361921515 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.9260491479 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303220082259 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175769243469 0.084324248473 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.262567180625 0.0667982634062 393% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283515374691 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.28978573525 0.056905535591 509% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.