Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv

Essay topics:

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Accordingly, sentiments given in the amphitheater are believed to accompany disrespect and could potentially break the formal doctrine, otherwise, it is essential to some people for the justification of educational betterment. I contend that in order to drive the existing conventional teaching methods for improving quality, criticism is important, given the right contexts.

For one, the view of criticizing contradicts moral and ethical behavior could be explained by several reasons, chief of which is the ramification of spoiled generations. Being allowed to confess their thinking to the tutor with a certain degree of respect, students often pose flexibility and even give trenchant comments with their out-of-control emotions. Occasionally, this is due to the fact that their deep internal sense of psychological satisfaction needs to be justified through verbal language, combining with actions such as hand gestures or upholded tonation to express the feeling of stress accumulating from daily discontent. For instance, there is student bias in some classes, leading to a sense of misery in the others, given the lack of confidence to compete with the superior one - the teacher’s favor and comments in this context could turn into arguments if teachers show no changes in their attitudes. Consequently, there will be immorality and impulsiveness in students' behavior and disciplines could be losing gradually.

For another, I still hold the view that students should have a right to give suggestions for adjustments in academic environments with orders to ensure the teaching quality. Apparently, students could trigger the misunderstanding or tutor’s wrong behavior as to both correcting and sharpening their critical thinking. After all, schools aim at generating well-rounded graduates and employers seek the outstanding, this is deemed an important feature of who is demanded in such a competitive society. Additionally, it is a more reasonable educational approach in which the learners are able to express their ideas autonomously, which will entail a dynamic learning environment when the process of exchanging thoughts is facilitated by the willingness of teachers to perceive comments and students’ respectful attitudes toward them. As a result, it will structure a solid and deliberate education system, promoting further abstractions.

To conclude, the concept of criticism depends upon personal perspectives toward it. Profoundly, the implications could bring dire consequences if actions are not taken under the consciousness of morality. Instead, it should be better used for improvement in any circumstances.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-13 MinhJoyluv 87 view
2023-04-23 thanh1927540 89 view
2023-04-19 thanh1927540 78 view
2023-04-19 thanh1927540 73 view
2023-04-19 thanh1927540 67 view
Essays by user sonnguyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ensuring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: ensuring
...ts in academic environments with orders to ensure the teaching quality. Apparently, stude...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, consequently, if, so, still, well, after all, as to, for instance, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76275510204 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33021822859 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614795918367 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.2687611913 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.6 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1333333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22076748738 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649391718935 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419166922703 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112662341356 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567934653158 0.056905535591 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.