Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a hotly-debated issue over whether highschool students should be given freedom to evaluate or even complain about their educators to enhance academic efficiency, or it should be prohibited due to lack of regard and order. In this essay, both views will be objectively delibrated prior to a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, one predominant reason why this two-way communication may trigger some repercussions is attributed to the fact that it will culminate in a harsh pedagogical environment. To be more specific, on the grounds that students and teachers hold distinct opinions when it comes to teaching method or curriculum, disagreements between them on these matters are unavoidable. This, coupled with the rebellious and arrogant behaviour among youngsters, will result in not only teenagers’ resentment, particularly when they are not given any persuasive response, but also the impatience of educators. Consequently, continual criticism and fierce debates will precipitate classes full of disrespect and disorganisation.
Nevertheless, I am of the opinion that students should be incentivised to assess teachers’ lessons. To begin with, this measure will enable youngsters to make the most of the lectures at school. As a matter of fact, there is no teaching method suitable for all learners, given that they have different levels of understanding. Students, therefore, are held accountable for giving constructive feedbacks about which part of the lesson they cannot comprehend. In addition, it is even more urgent to address the teachers’ inability to manage their classes effectively. A vivid illustration for this is that the onus is on them to deal with students’ low grades and conflicts at school, which are underlying distractions for their study. Hence, it is vital to express criticism so that teachers can promptly tackle the troubles, thus raising the learning ambience.
In conclusion, while students making evaluations about their guides should be forbidden to some extent, it is my reaffirmation that their comments and criticism are of great significance, seeing that they will contribute advantageously to the excellence of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-13 | MinhJoyluv | 87 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 67 | view |
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 73
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricans and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 89
- Some people believe that sport has an important role in society Others however feel that it is nothing more than a leisure activity for some people Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57657657658 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28098658655 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60960960961 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9879393084 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.642857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180253124905 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595754717177 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390342417116 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112633698829 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285007695262 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.