Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?

Essay topics:

Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?

Submitted by katey on Tue, 12/13/2016 - 10:05

Most people are convinced that production of materials and goods should be prioritized in a nation. I strongly disagree with this notion and I will explain further the drawbacks in my essay below.

It is true that producing extra perishable and non-perishable goods can merit citizens, primarily, because it will generate jobs to the people. With the high supplies needed, manpower will be much of demand. Also, there will be an upward trend in the economic status of the nation. This means that more taxes will be collected and would greatly be used for improving health and education. Apart from that, having more supplies during calamities can help compensate the needs of man.

However, there are factors that outweigh the advantages. Firstly, an increase probability of food spoilage and wastage of materials will be anticipated, especially, if there is more supply over demands. Secondly, prices and taxes are expected to escalate because of the fast production and transportation. Finally, nature will be in a dangerous state. Case in point, number of trees will be put down in order to produce paper bags and boxes for the packaging. Furthermore, usage of plastics is likely to be rampant as well. Improper disposable of garbage and deforestation will consequently lead to pollution and natural disasters such as flood, landslide and the like.
To sum it all up, although multiplying the number of supplies can be beneficial at some points, there are far more important factors that need to be considered by the people and the government.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-14 rohitbangari27@gmail.com 73 view
2019-09-18 moeinynsi 84 view
2019-07-31 simran1168 61 view
2016-12-13 katey 61 view
2016-12-13 katey 84 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by user katey :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1581027668 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86820381691 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2215360343 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162238410548 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561340199805 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489002834246 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107327721776 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221187249837 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.