Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
It is thought of most people that every government of the country objective must be to manufacture more number of merchandise and items of materials. However, it is difficult for the government to produce goods without knowing the requirements of the procurement. In this essay, I disagree with the increasing production is not a proper goal.
On the one hand, the number of products will be vary based on government changes at a certain period. So we cannot hope on the government, but the people think that the goal of every country needs to increase more production of goods and materials. However, every country started doing more production then who will buy those products, if not then the company will be in vain. So the government need to make a strict rule-based on need, company production needs to improve. If the companies need not follow the rules in order to make a profit then if loss happens to that company government will not respond. For instance, in 2019 India made the budget for that year 2019 and 2020. In that budget, the government want to see more electric vehicle on road, if this happens there will be less pollution and importing oil will also less. But this budget impact of TATA motors, is one of the huge production of making cars but today they are in huge loss because they didn't predict that government will rely on electric cars, they manufacture around 10,000 cars already and that is not being for sales.
On the other hand, the company always follow the rules, not the politician words. If the county will listen to the people words and then started producing more number of good and materials. Next thing will impact on a company not government or people. If the product did not sell as expected the company market then the cost of making production who will give to them. So the company always need to look upon the number of requests that they are getting based upon the need to manufacture otherwise they will doomed.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the idea of the number of manufacturers need to increase or making more goods and materials because if the sales were decline then the company will be a huge loss, so based upon the requirement of production needs to make.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | moeinynsi | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | simran1168 | 61 | view |
| 2016-12-13 | katey | 61 | view |
| 2016-12-13 | katey | 84 | view |
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. 61
- The charts show the percentage of income spent on food and other goods in 3 European countries from 1998 2008 68
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation. 73
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...y country started doing more production then who will buy those products, if not the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 965, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...oday they are in huge loss because they didnt predict that government will rely on el...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 510, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'doom'
Suggestion: doom
...need to manufacture otherwise they will doomed. In conclusion, I strongly disagre...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74358974359 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53199902575 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428205128205 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7133046798 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.823529412 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165706633085 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696684242009 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744479827108 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130591426761 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616924525647 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.