Many people assume taht the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disargree that constantly increasing production is an approriate goal?
Nowadays, there has been an ongoing argument that to stimulate the economy, every country should produce much more merchandise. From my perspective, I advocate for this idea except in several particular cases.
I believe that this idea brings a plethora of merits for the economy to flourish. First, since creating more products requires much more workforces for industry, thereby creating more and more jobs for the jobless, which in turn decreasing the jobless rates. Indeed, this idea is enormously meaningful to not only society but also the economy because of reducing subsidies for financially supporting the unemployed. Second, this idea also gives the merchants a variety of options to choose their desired garments with a better price or quality. That means the monopoly in a particular area is no longer anymore; thus, the cost becomes lower than ever.
Apart of advantages I mentioned above, I also think that this idea still has some demerits for enterprises. In virtue of having more products, companies take higher risks, which means that they lose more money for campaigns or adverts to get access to their potential customers. If all of goods could not be sold out, it will be a burden for the economy due to impacting negatively on the revenue. This idea, therefore, should be applied in a proportionate rate to keep the remain products at the minimum threshold. In reality, the economy of USA and its neighbor collapsed because the provision overtook the needs.
To sum up, although both the unemployed and the customers benefit from this idea, it still considers as a problem for the economy in the case the goods are not sold totally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[2]
Message: Wrong collocation. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: Apart from
...s, the cost becomes lower than ever. Apart of advantages I mentioned above, I also th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...applied in a proportionate rate to keep the remain products at the minimum threshold. In r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05090909091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66423139491 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9072249799 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927859626114 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346926429666 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05423054519 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637168438103 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478538710081 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.