Many people believe that the human society has developed into a throw-away society, which is filled with plastic bags and rubbish.
What are the causes and solutions?
There is a tendency that people produce more waste than ever before and the disposal of waste has become a severe environmental problem. To tackle this issue, I will discuss the reasons for this phenomenon and give possible solutions to this problem.
To begin with, the amount of waste has increased due to the consumer society. People tend to have more material desires because our society has informed a social atmosphere of mutual comparisons. For example, every time when Apple introduced the new iPhone, a large amount of people will buy the newest iPhone to follow the trendy although the old one still works. As a result, these old smartphones will be abandoned and become a source of waste. In addition, another important factor contributing to this phenomenon is over-packaging. Packaging has become an important part of selling. Therefore, producers put a lot of effort in packaging their products in order to attract consumers. Ironically, some packages are even larger than products themselves. Most packages are made in plastics, which are non-degradable materials and cannot be degraded in hundreds of years.
In order to tackle this issue, both individuals and governments should make effort. Firstly, for individuals, we can change our consumption habits. People can buy less unnecessary products and buy recycled products instead of those made in non-degradable materials. For example, we can use glass bottles to hold water instead of using plastic bottles. Secondly, governments should put legal limits on over-packaging and encourage producers to use environmental-friendly materials.
In conclusion, consumer society and over-packaging have led to this throw-away society. Both individuals and governments should take the responsibility to reduce the amount of waste and save the earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-08 | goodluck0101 | 83 | view |
- The three charts compare the change in expenditure of a UK school in three different years. 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- Today ,the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities.Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and incl 89
- Some people think that the main purpose of school is to turn children to good citizens and workers, rather than benefit them as individuals.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the amount of waste and save the earth.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49285714286 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20005580308 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3588120735 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.4444444444 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899836683316 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272261112358 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413052639235 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599555179256 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321122059956 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.