Nowadays, everyone especially teenagers are strongly influenced by the news covered by media related to any celebrity. A plethora of people think that these coverages affect the youngsters very badly. I do believe that these broadcasts have both positive and negative impact over every generation. Suitable points with supporting examples are mentioned in this essay in forthcoming paragraphs. Beginning with, children who are not mature enough to compare right and wrong get easily diverted by watching celebrities on television or any social network. To elaborate it, youngsters try to compare themselves with the celebrities in the field of money, skin, body and many more. Teenagers tend to copy the stars and sometimes this leads to wastage of money or time of the children or even they risk their own lives to be like celebrity. For instance, in America more than 200,000 teens had plastic surgery last year due to getting influenced by models on social network. Thus, media coverages of celebrities have adverse effect on adolescent. On the contrary, some actions broadcasted on social media can have a good and positive impact on young ones. In other words, gestures regarding charity and helping nature shown over the social platform can increase positive deeds performed by children. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo, a well-known football player donates blood regularly, and he even refuses to get any tattoo in order that he can donate his blood to the needy. Hence, a number of good activities can effect positively on teenagers. In conclusion, I partially agree with the statement given above. I consider that as a coin have two sides and same for the news and forecasts about the celebrities can have two distinct and beneficial results as it can influence child in a good or a bad way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10135135135 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76864652479 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6485014802 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203804251569 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688770164849 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612049191058 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203804251569 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.