It is suppossed that about lifestyle of famous personalities which is publicised by media,have a adverse impact on minors.i,however,completely disagree as sometimes coverage of such persons can be fruitfull for teens,although it has some negtive results,as per few.
Considering the merits which may be enjoyed by adolescents. To be social being that attribute, minors can have by watching models.as instance, "satyamev jayate" is indian television show which not only help society to overcome social issues but also provide sufficient knowledge about humanity, how to be a helping hand. Host of such show is celebrity "Amir khan" who is inspiration for many. Hence, coverage of this serial impact children in holistic manner which means vulnerable minds might become responsible dwellers and aid in community welfare. Even, when social media convey information regarding actors who experienced immense hardships to attain such fame. This story may have encouragement prospect for juveniles; never give up and always be positive towards life goals. In these manners, telecasting can be advantageous for minors.
Despite above mentioned, news relating celebrities are considered as absurdity. Cause of it is, imitating these persons in somehow affect preteens severely. As, actors are role models for children, and they want to become famous like them, media post drug life of celebrities by designating him/her as cool personality. Thus, naive minds opt this grave habit which advocates, they are indulging themselves on the way of death. Accounting stubborn attitude that children can have in future. Because famous one's promote supersticious products and lure minors for owing these, then children pressurise parents to get such merchandizes.
In conclusion, though media coverage about celebrities is worthy for adolescents on the grounds of good citizes and volunteering, but this phenomena has deterimental outputs for preteens
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , have
...rsonalities which is publicised by media,have a adverse impact on minors.i,however,co...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ities which is publicised by media,have a adverse impact on minors.i,however,comp...
^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
... media,have a adverse impact on minors.i,however,completely disagree as sometimes covera...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , although
... such persons can be fruitfull for teens,although it has some negtive results,as per few....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...ens,although it has some negtive results,as per few. Considering the merits whic...
^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is, imitating these persons in somehow affect preteens severely. As, actors are...
^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tubborn attitude that children can have in future. Because famous ones promote superstici...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s of good citizes and volunteering, but this phenomena has deterimental outputs for ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80689655172 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2883970702 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662068965517 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4454329172 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.266666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136223811437 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456910424816 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351725496739 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901235193777 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201607675524 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.