Many people believe that modern technology has made people more sociable, while others think that it has isolated them. Discuss both ideas and give your own opinion.
Due to the advancements in the telecommunication sector, people have been brought closer than any other previous generation. Undoubtedly, these breakthroughs made a significant impact on how individuals communicate today. However, it is a contentious issue whether it has made the millennials more social or less social. This essay will talk about both the viewpoints and will argue why the technological developments have dreadfully made people less friendly.
On the one hand, people can argue social networking sites and applications have increased the magnitude of social interactions happening every day. Whereas in the past, one has to go to a club, public park or a party to interact with others, nowadays, they can talk to anyone that too in another county without leaving their home. Such convenience makes it possible for individuals to talk to strangers or keep up with friends turning them into more sociable beings. Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat, for instance, makes it effortless to chat with others and establish new connections. Therefore, people have a strong believe in the notion of technology making the millennials more social.
On the other hand, others, including myself, think that modern technology has worsened people’s tolerance level eventually making them less sociable. The reason is simple to understand, online applications only provide suggestions about individuals who either have same set of ideals or share a common interest. If people are only socializing with those who have identical beliefs and ideology, there is strong possibility of becoming restricted to a certain number of people and increasing intolerance among them. For example, it might not come as a surprise that social media users create groups and only invite other users with similar interests. These days, one can see heated online debates about religious values or mocking other nationalities making headlines in news. Hence, technology has, indeed, made people less social.
Even though people of the twenty-first century are interacting at an unprecedented rate but they remain confined among a social circle that they like which is making them intolerant towards other beliefs that is not going to turn them into more sociable.
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some cities create new housing for their growing populations by constructing a smaller number of high rise buildings Other cities create more of low rise buildings Which solution is better in your opinion 95
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 89
- Some people believe the purpose of prison is to punish while others would argue that rehabilitation is its primary role Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities To what extent do you agree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ctions. Therefore, people have a strong believe in the notion of technology making the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46418338109 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94501795622 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593123209169 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0832563154 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.1875 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24010515313 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857259068083 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669132568647 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150055274675 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281785272669 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.