Many people believe that technological and science advance make food better whereas some others believe that because of it that food now is more harmful in people s life Discuss both views and say your opinion

There have been enormous changes in the variety and standards of food we eat every day due to several advancements in the field of science and technology. Some individuals opine that such reforms are detrimental to our health, whereas others believe that these improvements in preserving and processing food have made human lives easier. Both the contrasting views are discussed in this essay, and I believe that such advancements have risked human life and made us dependent on processed foods.

In the past two decades, the variety of food, which is very popular among local people, has been increased significantly. People argue that these eatables, specifically, processed foods, are essential for humans as it can be stored for a longer period of time, because of added preservatives and chemicals. Secondly, these foods are pre-cooked and take very less time to prepare, therefore a lot of time can be saved in food preparation. The use of such eatables can be seen in the military where soldiers carry food packets for a long period of time during their missions, and due to added preservatives, food can be stored for months without decaying.

On the contrary, some people believe that the scientific and technical improvements in the quality of food have made an adverse effect on our health; as such processed foods contain harmful chemicals, which have made it possible to store it for years. Furthermore, regular consumption of artificial additives in processed eatables makes our immune system weaker. For example, it has been scientifically proven by Oxford University that school children who consume packed junk food have less cognitive skills and they are unable to perform well in their academics. Therefore, such advancements are seen as a negative change for mankind.

To conclude, on the one hand, some individuals believe that the advancements in the quality of food have improved our lives, on the other hand, some people argue that these enhancements are detrimental to our health. I believe that we should not be dependent on artificial foods as the nutrients which our body needs can only be acquired by natural food.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...humans as it can be stored for a longer period of time, because of added preservatives and che...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... soldiers carry food packets for a long period of time during their missions, and due to added...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15142857143 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86166641904 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522857142857 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.310509472 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.692307692 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268077181457 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998430093069 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604003528273 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177867573695 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541792074451 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.