Many people depend on their cars for everyday domestic, social, and working needs. However, unlimited use of cars causes a number of problems. What are some of these problems? What can be done to reduce the use of cars?
.
There has been an increasing concern about the overuse of cars in daily activities in recent years. This essay will elaborate on both the issues of using automobiles and solutions to lessen the dependence on the vehicles.
There are several pitfalls associated with the role of cars in humans' lives. It is well-know that the car use is one of the main culprits of the deterioration of the environment. While the emission from car pollutes the air, the fabrication of these machines leaves collosal amount of carbon footprint in our habitat. The pollutants not only have an adverse effect on humans' respiratory systems, but contribute enormously to the degradation of the ecosystem. Another drawback of everyday use of car can be witnessed in the health of people who harness cars. In stead of walking or cycling for shorter distance, these people tend to opt for car thanks to its convenience. In the long run, the car users may face with reflex, and spine damage.
In order to lessen dependence on cars, the intervention of govenments is of primary importance. The authorities can exploit the mass media to educate the public about the negative implications of car use. This helps raise the awareness of civilians about their contribution to the well-being of the nature. Additionally, inventions of more eco-friendly replacements for car should be encouraged. One case in point is the advent of electric vehicles, which are subsidized and suportted with enlightened policies in many nations. Electric cars, motorbike, and so forth produce much less polluting fumes than their traditional counterparts while being integrated with many advanced driving features. These vehicles ensure a brighter life for humankind in years to come.
In sum, cars act a precursor to the gradual destruction of the ecosystem and people's health. The interference of governments in acknowledging the public and supporting of modern vehicles may decrease the use of cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-29 | Aakibsheikh | 78 | view |
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 84
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
- News coverage about violent crimes frightens people and encourages criminals Therefore some believe that this type of news should not be reported in newspapers or shown on TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- All fathers should be entitled to time off from work when their children are born To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
. There has been an increasing concern...
^^
Line 6, column 559, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Instead of'?
Suggestion: Instead of
... the health of people who harness cars. In stead of walking or cycling for shorter distance...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...face with reflex, and spine damage. In order to lessen dependence on cars, the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24444444444 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00883306783 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3257786006 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61111111111 7.06120827912 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315442768933 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920085676552 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605181212864 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174370449126 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066335415505 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.