Recently, that youngsters holding the fundamental position in the government have remained a controversy. Albeit its notable drawbacks, I am of the opinion that it is no more plausible than allowing young generation to manipulate their country
On the one hand, youngsters are not suitable for running a nation due to their lack of both required qualification and experience. First, young generation is thought to have insufficient capabilities such as diplomatic perspectives and consideration in a bid to curb various sensitive areas such as foreign affair and domestic affairs. As a result, it is hard for the youth to make the senior citizens accept their leadership. In addition, all of them have had the shortage of social experience. If they would not face many challenges in their career, they might make mistake, which jeopardizes the public’s lives.
On the other hand, I agree with the point of view that it is worth for the young being selected to play a crucial rule in states thanks to their open-mindedness and long-time dedication. First, young people often have a creative mindset and modern ways of facing dilemma, which enables them to develop breakthrough policies. Second, the young have a long period of time to contribute to their nations. For example, with the same capabilities and qualifications, a younger candidate is more likely to be elected than an older one in some countries because of their anticipated lifelong of devotion to public service in the future.
In conclusion, although there are strong arguments of youth political participation, it seems to me that on the whole, this trend delivers numerous benefits.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- how can you improve your productivity 22
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...policies. Second, the young have a long period of time to contribute to their nations. For exa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21722846442 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09683703816 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5722722633 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.636363636 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114015439752 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037093786041 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333469690156 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647261007248 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552440223723 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.