Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
There are indeed many people who prefer to watch foreign films rather than domestic productions. However, governments should promote locally produced films to generate more economic benefits.
There are various reasons why many people find international films to watch instead of products in their own countries. Firstly, in some developed countries, filmmaking is promoted dramatically by investing huge budgets for actional scenes, advanced effects, and spectacular locations. Hollywood blockbusters like Avengers are a typical example of such productions and its global appeal is undeniable. Additionally, some huge-scale film projects have an advantage in negotiating with famous actors or actresses. Therefore, poor quality, low-budget filmmaking in many countries is disadvantageous.
In my view, governments should support local film industries financially. In every country, there are always talented amateur filmmakers who only need to be given opportunities to prove themselves. If governments facilitate them, they could afford budgets for the salaries of film crews, accomplished actors or directors, and a nost of other costs related to producing high-quality films. This could lead to some significant economic benefits such as increased film sales and increased job opportunities. At the same time, promoting the national film industry could benefit governments by educating people proactively and preventing the loss of national identity and cultural heritage.
In conclusion, I believe that increased financial subsidies of governments could help to raise the quality of domestically produced films and allow them to compete with the foreign films that currently dominate the market. Lastly, this policy contributed significantly to the domestical cutural maitainance.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 56
- Some people think that it is worth researching different minerals in space Others however disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...nd cultural heritage. In conclusion, I believe that increased financial subsid...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06692913386 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19010624487 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677165354331 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5867069232 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489267729802 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15180651645 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130909811189 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3000767058 0.151304729494 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144983040232 0.056905535591 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.63 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.