Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.
What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems?
In recent decades, the social distance which is a result of wealth inequality have been exacerbated. Although there are some existing problems due to this social gap, effective solutions should be considered as soon as possible. And the essay below will explain more about my opinion.
There are a number of problems caused by the wealth inequality. First, poor people might have less opportunities for education and health care service because they are not able to pay off their bills. In fact, nowadays, the number of poor people who are forced to quit schools or suffer from severe illnesses has been increasing dramatically over the past decades. Second, the wide gap between poor and rich people can lead to an instability of the society. According to numerous updating surveys, there is a close correlation between the crime rate and the wealth inequality. In other words, when the poor could not have abilities to cover their own lives, they tend to involve in crimes such as robbery, burglary or deception.
Nevertheless, there have been many good solutions for these problems. First, by imposing higher taxes on the rich, governments have an effective way to raise funds and then support the poor as supplementary benefit. Moreover, national social organizations could contribute a substantial impact to address the problems. This means that poor people should feel free when seeking for job opportunities, scholarships and health insurance at these organizations. The more poor people’s demands are met, the more crime rate could be reduced in turn.
In conclusion, wealth inequality has been receiving a great deal of concern due to its social impact. By adjusting tax policies and supporting social organizations, government can be a decent contributor to a fairer society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | NUT | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- Different people have different approaches to life Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences Which category do you fall into and why Give reasons for your answer and use specific examples to support your answer 61
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Different people have different approaches to life Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences Which category do you fall into and why Give reasons for your answer and use specific ex 78
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 84
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 78
- Different people have different approaches to life Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences Which category do you fall into and why 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...equality. First, poor people might have less opportunities for education and health ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24041811847 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88403676376 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602787456446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3048892946 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273175086687 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823276074344 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772911932998 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139690176538 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09622576128 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.