Many people think good planning is a key factor for life success. Others think other factors are more important (hard working, luck, etc.). Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is true that the question of whether to have a well-prepared plan or hard work as the key for life success remains as the source of controversy. While a number of people believe that careful planning is the main factor leading to life success, I would argue that other factors such as hard work and luck are better choices.
On the one hand, the option of having a good plan is attractive for one reason. The reason is planning is a great method to control the schedule. Time is a prestigious resource that cannot be retrieved. For that reason, people have to create efficient plans for both essential assignments and less important ones. A case in point is the subjects’ timetable for students at school. From that, learners can prepare for those lessons before class. Therefore, an acceptable arrangement is a crucial gear for everyone.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe that there are several factors such as hard work and luck that can also affect life success. Firstly, hard work is a great characteristic for success. Hard working means doing a bulk of work. Thereby, hard working people often gain promotion and superior jobs. Secondly, luck also should be involved as a factor for life success. Luck can be seen as an external factor that solves hard questions and promotes more belief in work . To illustrate, when inventing the telephone, Alexander Bell accidently found out that electricity is the key just through taking up the phone and noticed the received voice from his assistant. Thus, working hard and having some luck are two of the important factors to life success.
In conclusion, although both views have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to concentrate on other factors such as luck and dedication than just having a good plan for life success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-06 | Mike-Huang | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | vuhieuquy123 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | vuhieuquy | 71 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether to have a well-prepared plan or hard wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hard work and luck are better choices. On the one hand, the option of having a ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gement is a crucial gear for everyone. Apart from the practical benefits expres...
^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...estions and promotes more belief in work . To illustrate, when inventing the telep...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the important factors to life success. In conclusion, although both views have ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t having a good plan for life success.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89677419355 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63049629495 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529032258065 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9544068559 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420665693351 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132961811518 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955138759621 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267904720971 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831734033915 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.