Many people think good planning is a key factor for life success. Others think other factors are more important (hard working, luck, etc.). Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many opine that good planning is indispensable for people who want to have life success; however, others claim that there are several components which is more crucial. Both views are of great significance and I will elaborate which in the following words.
On the one hand, a good planning helps people a lot in a successful way due to some reasons. Firstly, it is beneficial for people to gain the achievement easier. This is because people could follow particular steps and understand thoroughly how to fulfill these tasks. This means they will have more effort and that plans will remind them what to do to gain their aims. Secondly, making plans helps to make time adjustments in the future. They could predict what to do in the next hours or days. In illustrate, at school, students often learn how to manage their time and the arrangement of their tasks in a day is extremely necessary that make them spend time appropriately.
On the one hand, not only a good planning but also hard-working is one of the elements helping people to succeed. It is obviously that although a person has good planning skills, people do not have enough hard work and do not follow based their plan as well as they do not succeed. Otherwise, if they work hard, and accomplish their tasks every day, they could gain success easily.
In conclusion, while many argue it is important to have good planning, others believe there are some more important factors. In my opinion, in order to have life success, people have more skills not only good planning but also hardworking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-06 | Mike-Huang | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | vuhieuquy123 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | vuhieuquy | 71 | view |
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centres provide the best care Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people think that hosting international sports events may be beneficial for a country Discuss both views
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a successful way" with adverb for "successful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and, a good planning helps people a lot in a successful way due to some reasons. Firstly, it is ben...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is obviously that although a person has good planning skills, people do not have...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78518518519 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57039171728 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52962962963 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9641994478 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257714231875 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092405954244 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731737814787 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182583934887 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067141362881 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.