Many people think that it is unnecessary to teach children handwriting skills in this technology age. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, the use of technology is quickly rising, particularly in the COVID-19 epidemic. Alternative study styles are also becoming more technologically influenced. Despite this, I strongly disagree that handwriting skills are no longer necessary for youngsters and give evidence to support my position.
First, there is no doubt that handwriting is the foundational step and plays a critical part in becoming proficient in any new language. To be more specific, because a complex cognitive process combines neuro-sensory experiences and fine motor abilities, youngsters would grasp and identify letters by practicing and harnessing them daily. Every school starts teaching on how to write all the letters of English as it is an international communication language, for instance, to remember and register words in their subconscious mind. This improves the cognitive ability of a child in such a way that familiarizing with dialect is instant.
Secondly, handwriting has a great impact on the analytical process. It necessitates youngsters’ brains to slow down to look at the "big picture" of problem-solving and select the appropriate information. Subsequently, by picking information, they can actively recapitulate key components, reframe them in their own words, and present them most creatively, whereas typing, on the other hand, requires a great deal of complicated manipulation and also distracts children. As a result, not only do academic and professional performance improve, but young people are also better able to recall and logically expand on previous work. For example, the most common way that many academics urge students to use in their learning is summarization through hand-drawn mindmap. Since children choose to systematize by mindmap, recent studies prove that their ability to retain and memorize knowledge has more advancements than using technology’s counterpart.
In conclusion, although typing options have geared exceedingly toward the writing of every kind, the benefits of handwriting skills are those that develop intrinsic as well as extrinsic talents, paving the road for self-improvement and honing the talents that are still lacking. As a result, in my opinion, schools should instill these talents in youngsters to avoid their progress being stifled in any way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64672364672 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2731137211 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65811965812 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5852330699 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.133333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0666666667 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152645810257 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457616143606 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393326313401 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884098498288 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600709298824 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.