Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leaders Others thinks that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views

Essay topics:

Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leaders. Others thinks that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views.

Leadership quality can dramatically accelerate an organization or business and any specific task by being lead by a person. Many people claim that some individuals are naturally good leaders. On the other hand, some think that leadership quality can be learn. I will discuss both views before giving my opinion.
A convincing note that leadership skills are significant in operating a business, startup, and especially in teaching and so on. Firstly, many people think that one born with this type of quality. Furthermore, by adding some facts to the point, leadership quality is often induced more due to learning from failures and from life experience moments. For instance, many humongous organization had started their journey from a platform and leading them to the summit, like, Tesla, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and so on. Learning from odds and continuously developing their default skills up to the mark.
On the other hand, some of them believe in leadership quality that they can learn. Moreover, it is quite convincing, one can teach themselves anything. In my opinion for generating leadership skills, the suitable option could be any sports activity. For example football, volleyball, rugby where team members rely on a good and motivated strategy. However, there are courses, seminars and workshops available.
In my opinion leadership quality can also be learn and anyone can learn anything if they are enthusiastic about it.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-04-02 g-o-k-u 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cuss both views before giving my opinion A convincing note that leadership skills...
^^^
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ping their default skills up to the mark On the other hand some of them believe i...
^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...skills the suitable option could be any sports activity For example football volleybal...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...courses seminars and workshops available In my opinion leadership quality can als...
^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ything if they are enthusiastic about it
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18421052632 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74255757233 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587719298246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 228.0 20.2975951904 1123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1182.0 106.682146367 1108% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 228.0 20.7667163134 1098% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 127.0 7.06120827912 1799% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401323310447 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.401323310447 0.084324248473 476% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241778887249 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142183605494 0.056905535591 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 117.0 13.0946893788 893% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -168.4 50.2224549098 -335% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 93.4 11.3001002004 827% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.24 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.03 8.58950901804 222% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 93.2 10.1190380762 921% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 94.0 10.7795591182 872% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.