Many university students live with their families, while others live away
from home because their universities are in different places. What are the
advantages and disadvantages of both situations?
Lots of students, nowadays, have to live in dorms because their home is far away from universities, while others love to stay with their families. However, both situations always have their pros and cons.
On the one hand, living with families and relatives, of course, have some advantages. Firstly, the economical accommodation, these students don't have to pay for their living fee, and they can save the amount of money to do something else. Secondly, if they live in wealthier families, their parents will support them such as meals, electronics cost, space sharing. Therefore, they don't have to allocate their finance for this thing. However, although these students carefree about basic life, their cooperation skills and skills to take care of themselves will, definitely, limit in some ways. In the result, if these students work in companies, they can face lots of disadvantages because of lacking these skills.
On the other hand, students stay away from home, obviously, also have some pros and cons. In disadvantage terms, They have to share the living spaces with other classmates in order to afford the cost of accommodation, and all of them always allocate their money in a suitable way. Besides that, living together will have lots of distraction which can affect the routine life of students. However, in the advantages side, they can support each other in studying, caring, sharing the joys and sorrows. More than that, these students are trained crucial life skills which will help them when they graduate and go to work.
In conclusion, students can stay with their parents and relatives or must live away from home because their universities are in different places, these two options always have both advantages and disadvantages.
- The pie charts below show the proportion of the whole school expenditure in five differences sources over the periods between 1981 and 2001. 67
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 61
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. 56
- The map below shows the outline of the village of Chorleywood in the period from 1868 to 1994. 67
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...conomical accommodation, these students dont have to pay for their living fee, and t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of money to do something else. Secondly, if they live in wealthier families, thei...
^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cs cost, space sharing. Therefore, they dont have to allocate their finance for this...
^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a suitable way" with adverb for "suitable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...all of them always allocate their money in a suitable way. Besides that, living together will hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them when they graduate and go to work. In conclusion, students can stay with th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18245614035 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62804440996 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.551589337 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346552545809 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127707854693 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10143321652 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267397303917 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975844753255 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.