One of the most conspicuous trend of today's world is a colossal upsurge in number of people believing that at most of workplaces e-communication is gaining more popularity rather than by face communication. In my opinion, benefits of this apprehension sounds more rational than it's drawbacks.
To commence with, there are deluges of arguments in favor of advantages offered by online meetings.The most preponderant one is to save time. To elaborate it, as for face to face conversation person have to travel from one place to another which consume their precious time and also change funds while in online communication person can talk to another person at long distance without paying money and travelling. It can not only contribute to save time, but also lead to other benefits in various fields. Thanks to wide range of advantages e-meeting offers, Employs can enhance their productivity and quality of their lives much ease and efficacy. Needless to say, all these merits stand in one good stead, as far as augmenting their chance of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned propositions is that it is only likely to help one excel and thrive by making suitable environment. This is because, in offline meeting person feel nerves to speak in new atmosphere but in online he or she can make their surrounding as according to there tastes and they speak without can type of interruption. For instance, a study result published by the government of Australia in March 2012, clearly indicate that 30% of employs feel much better in online meetings and give their full response to their work as compare to face to face conversation. Hence, it clear that why many are in favor of this viewpoint.
On the other hand, a section of society contradict above said view by providing some justification. The primary factor is that person can not show his impression on others. To explain it, in e-meeting human can not be judge because only face is appear on screen and this think not helpful for employs to show their emotions. Therefore, some are not agree with above said viewpoint.
To conclude, having pondered over above stated that it is crystal clear online communication at workplaces provide more advantages than face to face meeting.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the workplaces') or simply say ''most workplaces''.
Suggestion: most of the workplaces; most workplaces
...e in number of people believing that at most of workplaces e-communication is gaining more popular...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...f advantages offered by online meetings.The most preponderant one is to save time. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
... full response to their work as compare to face to face conversation. Hence, it clear that why ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
...to face to face conversation. Hence, it clear that why many are in favor of this view...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...their emotions. Therefore, some are not agree with above said viewpoint. To conclude...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, while, as for, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05540897098 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88319399704 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55672823219 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3472821681 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267772579638 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802163355694 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870588095449 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175126993117 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929257755372 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the workplaces') or simply say ''most workplaces''.
Suggestion: most of the workplaces; most workplaces
...e in number of people believing that at most of workplaces e-communication is gaining more popular...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...f advantages offered by online meetings.The most preponderant one is to save time. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
... full response to their work as compare to face to face conversation. Hence, it clear that why ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
...to face to face conversation. Hence, it clear that why many are in favor of this view...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...their emotions. Therefore, some are not agree with above said viewpoint. To conclude...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, while, as for, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05540897098 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88319399704 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55672823219 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3472821681 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267772579638 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802163355694 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870588095449 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175126993117 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929257755372 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.