The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015

Essay topics:

The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015

The two given maps illustrate the changes in the layout of the ground floor in a particular university department between 2000 and 2015.
In general, it can be seen that the number of seminar rooms added to the main building. Several new buildings and new facilities were constructed in the area.
The main apartment building containing three seminar rooms in 2000 expanded into five rooms in 2015, while the library was pulled down to make space for an officer. In addition, there were some new facilities reconstructed in the grassland east of the main apartment an IT center, and a library. A small corridor connected to the IT center and the library on the east of the map. Finally, the main building in 2015 had a new parking lot installed in the south, which is located next to the main street and road. Meanwhile, the street, as well as the main entrance to the department remained unchanged.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-06 giangngoc 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...he grassland east of the main apartment an IT center, and a library. A small corridor...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
...ssland east of the main apartment an IT center, and a library. A small corridor connec...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
... library. A small corridor connected to the IT center and the library on the east of t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
...y. A small corridor connected to the IT center and the library on the east of the map....
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, well, while, in addition, in general, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 1615.20841683 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 157.0 315.596192385 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74522292994 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 4.20363070211 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64655621661 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 176.041082164 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 506.74238477 44% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0634431446 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189735779414 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877509578186 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151060262405 0.0667982634062 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187982158986 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210034656506 0.056905535591 369% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.