.The land requirement for manufacturing meat is comparatively higher than for growing crops. Some people claim that global meat use ought to be decreased due to the limited availability of land. To bring the rates of meat use down, two methods can be applied: prioritizing fish and plant food use and discouraging meat use. However, these can affect the well-being of mankind in the long run.
Promoting plant products and fish is the best method to reduce eating meat. Put simply, this can be achieved by raising public awareness about the health benefits of alternative food items and the disadvantages of meat consumption. For example, were people to know the positive effects of vitamins, minerals, and anti-oxidant, which are contained in fruits and vegetables, they will add an extra amount of those food into their meals instead of meat. Not only do they add fruits and vegetables, but they will deliberately reduce meat consumption if they know that meatatarians are 75% more likely to develop cardiovascular diseases in their fifty’s, according to the annual newsletter of the national health ministry.
However, the reduced amount of meat in meals causes chronic anemia. In other words, the bioavailability of iron in plant foods is markedly lower than meat iron, thereby the iron absorption is lower for plant foods, which leads to low levels of hemoglobin in the blood. In turn, anemia gives rise to various long-term health issues, including poor cognition and chronic heart failure. This is supported by a recent study conducted at Oxford University, in which they claimed that the Mathematical skills of 14 to 16 aged vegetarians is 50% less than meat-eaters.
In conclusion, some people believe that meat-eating should be decreased due to the scarcity of lands, which are necessary in large amounts for the production of meat. This can be done by educating the public about the positive effects of alternative food and the negative effects of animal flesh. However, the reduction of global meat consumption will lead to chronic health issues due to the anemia caused by the lower bioavailability of plant iron.
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The given graph shows the nitrogen oxide emissions produced by four vehicles 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
.The land requirement for manufacturing m...
^
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
.The land requirement for manufacturing meat...
^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'those foods'?
Suggestion: this food; those foods
...ables, they will add an extra amount of those food into their meals instead of meat. Not o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1613832853 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88912337217 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536023054755 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5702709518 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.4 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289264047361 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107270362637 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680647644411 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184514103341 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504686286132 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.