The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that broadcast stations and journalists should focus on positive news rather than negative news. In my perspective, I think that although good news is definitely beneficial for readers, bad news also has its own value which should not be underestimated. This essay will explain my reasoning.
There are two major factors why many people prefer to make positive stories a priority in different news channels and media outlets. First of all, good news could transmit positive effects on the general public. To be more specific, if most contents of social media lead towards positive stories, it helps restore our faith in humanity, which will encourage readers to stay optimistic, supportive and faithful. Second, in terms of education, piece of stories about the example of poor students overcoming difficulties will, to a certain extent, motivate others to study and have a positive psychological implication.
On the other hand, adverse news also show their own certain benefits which help people to stay aware of problems around them and take accordant actions. It is clear that shocking titles can easily draw the attention of the public, so using them as a tool to raise people's awareness regarding social matters or global issues would be the best way. For example, articles about the concerning climate changes have contributed to the popularly of the Earth Hour - an annual worldwide movement which encourages communities to turn off non-essential lightings in an hour. Another illustration is the increasing reports on plastic pollution which has caused serious damages to all living beings, and this has resulted in a movement to restrict the use of plastic products and plastic bags.
In conclusion, although releasing much good news on the mass media will spread positive effects on people's lives, bad news will point out the problems that people have not dealt with well, thereby offering suitable measures to solve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 89
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 79
- The pie diagrams show the extent of Australian optional school graduates who were jobless, utilized or seeking after further training, in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 78
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009 84
- In many countries people like to eat a wider range of food that cannot be grown in their local place Therefore much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... could transmit positive effects on the general public. To be more specific, if most contents ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71495198569 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.9497785313 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207934360132 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717622960768 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467699400477 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123681697326 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449281862295 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.