The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average, in 2009 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of gasoline consumption for transit in 6 different nations, which belong to European Union, and compares with the EU average in 2 years between 2009 and 2010.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that Slovakia spent the most fuel in transport in the given years while the opposite was true for Greece. In addition, the EU average was higher than the figures for all countries, except for Slovakia.
In 2009, the transportation sector in Slovakia used nearly 9% of the total oil, double than Italy. The level of using fuel for moving in France and Spain was quite equal, approximately 5%. Greece was the country which consumed the least petrol, just above 1% and only one-fifth of Austria. Beside, the average percent of consuming fuel in EU was 6%.
One year later, the figure for Austria remained unchanged, at just over 5%. Slovakia and Spain decreased the amount of fuel, which was used in transportation, to about 6.5% and 4% respectively. Meanwhile, the rest of other countries witnessed an increase in those figures, correspondingly rough 5% for Italy, 2% for Greece and above 4% for France. European's average fuel consumption also fell 1% in the same year.
- As life expectancy is increasing people work after retirement with pay Alternatively some people start to work at a young age Are these positive or negative impacts 89
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 67
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99024390244 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77510818907 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614634146341 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9262590238 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237518756132 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956325536669 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660191138195 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153571066024 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611111875004 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.