Men are placed in most high level jobs. Some people say that the government should encourage a certain percentages of these jobs to be reserved for women.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Undeniably, males have a remarkably splendid job. It is frequently assumed that female should be imposed by higher authority to cope with exceeding margin of a proportion of these works. What I reckon is that this certainly is a rational phenomenon which requires to opt. Reasons behind my argument are explained in the ensuing paragraphs.
To embark with, certainly, if a woman will be given a high-level job, then her family would be fed and survived better than it is now. Most of the high-level jobs are well-paid, thus it is essential for women to do highly attention works if they are good at that kind of work. Hence, by adding a monthly salary of women, a family can enjoy their lifestyle and even they can have a variety of eating options be it, pizza or cakes which are expensive. In addition, if women are encouraged to cope with the complex level job, then it would be better to maintain good communication skills. At the workplace, women meet different masses and interact with them which is not possible to do while sitting at home. For example, according to a survey by IIM in India, women acquired 70% effective communication traits as compared to man, since they were enrolled in white colour jobs. This is only due to the fact that women are more interested in work.
However, it is not possible or appropriate for every woman to enrol in high-level jobs because of the issue of their safety. Sometimes owing to women’s beauty, pessimistic men tend to be attracted on her face. Consequently, the man may do any hazardous work, such as flirt or kidnapping. Nevertheless, this may be prohibited if women take some steps to ensure her safety and avoid to keep in touch with dreadful men. For instance, in some high-level jobs like a doctor or a lawyer, women’s often have to face some flirts of males but if they are conscious about awful behaviour of males, then they can get rid out of those flirting.
In conclusion, women can give different food to her family and take good life experience for their family if they are doing high level jobs. However, it is not possible for controlling bodies to encourage every women to do high level job due to women’s safety. But this may be tackled if she takes some pre-cautionary steps to avoid to talking with worst behaviour men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-30 | Shivam patel | 73 | view |
- The chart shows use of social media by men and women in Austrelia in 2007 and 2014 66
- Many people believe that the lecture halls have been replaced by online learning To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The graph below gives information about U..S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008. 73
- The widespread use of the internet has a bad effect on people development.What are the problems Suggest some solution 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'opting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: opting
...is a rational phenomenon which requires to opt. Reasons behind my argument are explain...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 773, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a survey by IIM in India, women acquired 70% effective communication traits as co...
^^
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the worst'.
Suggestion: with the worst
...re-cautionary steps to avoid to talking with worst behaviour men.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71960297767 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67430948758 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533498759305 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4655046146 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.105263158 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84210526316 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327113763574 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101272124303 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678785422456 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207753812053 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488217301327 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.