Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their social lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
There is no doubt that modern technology have transformed the people’s communication, so that the people spend less time seeing their friends. Some people think this has had a negative effect on their social lives, but not at all.
Looking back in the past, people communicated with friends via letters or phone. This took a long time to sent and wait for it. It is also quite expensive as the transportation cost. Especially, when someone is busy and in a far distance, it may be difficult to have a face to face meeting.
Nowadays, there are many modern forms of communication such as email, messaging, facebook and so on. There are much more convenient benefits. We can be in constant contact with all our friends. Getting information is faster. It is also cheaper and easier to keep in touch with other friends in different places. These modern forms allow us to send out voice, pictures and show his or her face who is talking to. This will make the conservation more interesting.
On the other hand, the way people connect to each other has changed greatly. Some people use the social media to acquaint with many friends so that they can have good relation to improve their social lives. However, someone use it to cheat the others. For instant, the trickish will use unreliable information to sell the wrong goods. Then they get the money illegal. They may inform unreal news about politician, health, education and so on. This can be a new crime, the electronic crime.
In conclusion, I believe that generally people's lives have got better. In my view, it is difficult to argue that developed communication has had a harmful influence on our social lives. On the other hand, we need to make sure that how we use it for.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | Ha Phan Ngoc Quan | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Ha Phan Ngoc Quan | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-31 | tienthao72 | 58 | view |
| 2018-02-23 | zanny | 61 | view |
| 2016-09-20 | jimpan | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...ve their social lives. However, someone use it to cheat the others. For instant, th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, then, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75907590759 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65189270836 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580858085809 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7693412823 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.6956521739 106.682146367 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1739130435 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69565217391 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268614938233 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615098405272 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772601836541 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154980504936 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104091383439 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.0946893788 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.44 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.