Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive the government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disavantages?
These days, the level of education is one of the greatest priorities for the employers. Several people claim that only aspects that are in demand for the community should be free, whereas less important spheres should not have the government's support. In my point of view, the disadvantages of this method far more outweigh the advantages.
To begin with, those who believe that focusing on more essential curriculum by young adults and government as well is beneficial for the society, have their own reasons. Society may be in need for the skills and abilities of the students who graduated from the universities, where they were maintained by the government presenters, so it is the key point of why they should be funded. Moreover, in the long-term run, the students who were supported by the governments and get the relevant jobs may contribute to the leading aspects of the country such as economics by implementing fresh ideas and sustaining the life of millions. Thus, the government should help them to make their educational background for the long run.
On the other hand, if the governments pay university fees for only particular subjects, due to the fact, that more and more candidates would apply for the free payment faculties. Consequently, it would lead to the abundance of specialists in certain fields, leading to the even greater unemployment. Also, students who want to get the most out of the benefit of free educational system would eventually leave the university, which means the growth of government's subsidization without benefit or even more aggravated case of being unhappy with the job. Therefore, governments should set free education for every direction, as unsettled adults should have the facilities to find their beloved path.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that with making free education, the society would advantage more than just funding the most frequently needed abilities.
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- Holidays honor people or events. If you could create a new holiday, what person or event would it honor and how would you want people to celebrate it? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- The graph below shows the reason for the use of social media by businesses by size of business in 2012 82
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19677419355 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89228224177 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7820809105 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.25 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235836072748 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813776371889 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399010264527 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127075515956 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586751162382 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.