Modern technology is now very common in many work places.How do you think this has changed the way we worked?Do you think there are disadvantages to reply too much on technology?

In this day and age, technology plays a pivotal role in most workplaces. In the past, although a certain number of technologies was present in the office, most of the work was done manually. Yet today, seemingly due to the advent of modern technology such as the Internet, the mobile phone and the like, never before has the productivity rate reached such peaks. This is often cited as a reason for fostering the use of modern technology in working places more and more.
Modern technology has taken over offices, industries and factories just to name a few. From automation of manufacturing goods to drone waiters in restaurants, the ubiquity of modern technology has dramatically increased the productivity in all major sectors whilst lowering the costs. This, in turn, has completely transformed people’s relationship to work.
Considering the rapid pace of automation in workplaces, it seems safe to assume that in the mid-term most repetitive tasks will end up being automatised, to some extent at least. Such a trend has been shown in practically all sectors, including the military. Not surprisingly, drones are already being used in warfare, automatising crucial life-and-death decisions that were once the job of human soldiers.
That modern technology has radically changed the way we work is evident. Hence, albeit I acknowledge all the advances brought about by the use of technology in workplaces, it is my belief that to delegate certain tasks to machines might be ethically dubious at best and should be thought through very carefully. After all, relying on algorithms to decide some critical situations may have unpredictable outcomes.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, after all, at least, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2641509434 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06689160824 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5608129052 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202024784906 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800187085289 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870392029773 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117172036949 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695067856375 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.