In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medicines.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people believe that in today's world, humans no longer need animals in making food, clothing or medicines products. Personally, I disagree with this opinion because people are still in great demand of animals, particularly in food and pharmaceutical manufacturing. Nevertheless, the advancements in science can help people to reduce human uses of animals in clothing industry.
Animals play a crucial role in numerous different areas of human life, especially in the production of food and medicines. Clearly, animals provide much of the meat eaten by the human population, whether farmed or hunted, and meat is an essential source of various vital nutrients. Therefore, animal-sourced food is significant part of humans' diet. Stopping using animals as food means that all humans must practise vegetarianism or veganism for nourishment and this is simply impossible. In addition, animals are needed in research to develop drugs and medical procedures to treat diseases. Animals are ideal research subjects because they are biologically similar to humans and have many of the same health problems. Therefore, animal testing is needed in order to test the effectiveness and safety of a newly-discovered cure or medicine. Scientists must do experiments on animals since there are no alternatives and it is impractical and unethical to study humans.
However, the usage of animals in other industries can be limited significantly thanks to the inventions of new artificial materials. Taking clothing manufacturing as a typical example for this. In the past, many animal species were hunted and farmed for their fur or skin to make clothing items and accessories. However, at present, humans would not need any of the animal's body parts since there are now many synthetic materials available today with their quality as high as the animal-derived textiles, such as synthetic wool or artificial leather. Also, thanks to the discovery of synthetic dyes, people stop using insects, such as snails or bugs, for textile dyeing.
In conclusion, it seems to me that human's demands of using animals and animal products are still tremendously great, which can be clearly in food and pharmaceutical sector. However, human uses of animals can decline thanks to scientific discoveries and this has been proved in clothing industry.
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicines To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 92
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n uses of animals in clothing industry. Animals play a crucial role in numerous ...
^^^
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...stry. Animals play a crucial role in numerous different areas of human life, especially in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39669421488 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05303768256 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559228650138 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.502592503 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.833333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285214291455 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966770934628 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602425665244 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190305401257 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633291497916 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.