It is believed that the government budgets should be allocated to public facilities such as educational institutions and medicine rather than space exploration projects. Personally, I totally agree with this viewpoint and will discuss my explanation below.
There are several reasons why space programmes should be abandoned. Firstly, these activities cost the government an excessive amount of money for scientific research and training space staff involved. Besides, it is extremely expensive to pay for facilities and equipment required in space stations as well as space rockets. Secondly, these programmes do not benefit the normal people in our daily lives as they are simply vanity projects for politicians. Finally, many space missions fail completely because of a subtle technological error, which can cost astronauts their lives. The exactly same example can be witnessed in a space shuttle trial in the USA years ago, where 5 brave astronauts sacrificed their lives only after 5 minutes of launching. In my opinion, space projects like this one are not worth the risks at all.
For these reasons, I believe that money from space programmes should be distributed to vital public services instead. It is much affordable to train doctors, teachers, police, and other public service workers than astronauts or space scientists and engineers who work on space exploration projects. Furthermore, the money taken from space projects can remarkably help reducing poverty and improve life quality for every member of society. For example, we all use schools, hospitals, and roads, and we all need the security that the police provide. If governments reallocate the space spending, thousands of people can be lifted out of poverty and given better life quality.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the idea that funds spent on space exploration are needed to be used for services that benefit us all and not to waste resources that do not improve our everyday lives.
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 73
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause What are the solutions to address those problems 84
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...from space projects can remarkably help reducing poverty and improve life quality for ev...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33653846154 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80386806353 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7826532802 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261285608234 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870381321319 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626823480514 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160953726275 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263826273444 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.