Many people claim that studying in a classroom with a group of students brings more advantages to both teachers and students than distance learning at home. I agree that face-to-face studying has more benefits, however, I do suppose that within this rampant COVID pandemic, we had better learning from home since there are also heaps of positive prospects.
On the one side, people believe that learning in person in classrooms not only bolsters the edification process of students but also improve other life skills for them such as communication or teamwork skill. Studying in classrooms means teachers can understand students' feelings and directly help them solve problems while it is somehow difficult for students to express themselves on their small screens. For example, Vietnamese children who are starting their first grade at primary school must learn how to read and write letters. And they could fulfil their tasks only with the instruction from the teachers, who were completely trained. Furthermore, the traditional learning method gives more interacting opportunities between students and teachers, therefore helps to advance their social skills.
Nevertheless, amid this hazardous pandemic, all people are supposed to learn and work from home for the whole social safety. Therefore, online learning is the best choice for students at the moment. Besides the drawback which is lack of interaction and concentration, this modern learning method has many potentials. Firstly, learning from home means students, teachers do not have to commute to school, as a result, they are all safe with no chance to be infected by the Coronavirus. Secondly, many brilliant apps are created for learning purposes such as ZOOM and TEAMS which have some amazing functions such as dividing students into small rooms, where they can discuss freely the lessons.
In conclusion, the traditional direct learning method benefits both teachers and students in instructing and absorbing knowledge. Nevertheless, it is more crucial for all of them to engage in online learning since it also has lots of prospects.
- The following charts represent the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Buying things online such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39817629179 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78047228652 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9188470123 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265545143001 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995331747931 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602297026555 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173472138865 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571502499235 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.