The money spent on research has brought enormous benefits to mankind, but it could be more usefully applied. How far do you agree?
Whether people should spend money on science remains controversial. Some people think that because of enormous benefits that research has brought to humankind, we should invest financially in science while others claim that money could be more useful if it is used to tackle the crisis around the world. I partly agree with the former opinion.
It is argued by some people that money should be spent to solve problems like food crisis, poverty, and human health rather than to do research. They maintain that how can we research with an empty stomach and disease raging? While every 30 seconds an African child dies of hunger, should we use the money for laboratories?
However, there are many reasons for people to believe in investment for research. First of all, science is now playing an essential role in our lives as it effects on everything we do from eating to traveling. For example, we buy the food from the supermarket the flavors and additive have all been measured and tested scientifically. Another good example here is quantum computers. With its power, quantum computing could put a stop to traffic jams since quantum algorithms could take advantage of qubits' computational properties to determine the best route for drivers. The fastest supercomputers on Earth can not currently do it. Today's quantum computers are not there yet, so, scientists need to do more researches to create them. Without financial support, scientists cannot do it. Secondly, a commonly held belief is that the wealth of a nation is concerned with its scientific development. They claim that modern economics can not advance without a strong scientific base. A good example here is the USA, which produces a significant number of science graduates and has a thriving economy.
From that have been discussed above, we can give the conclusion that both points of view have their merits. Although human life has priority in our societies, the importance of research cannot be denied. Therefore, the government should spend money on both research and other human life issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-21 | VuXuan | 78 | view |
| 2015-07-13 | roxanaluca | 80 | view |
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisos where relevant. 67
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people in Great Britain living alone by age and sex in 2004 2005 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 62
- The table describes in thousands the estimated and actual numbers of houses built in the UK by region in 2002 67
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether people should spend money on science re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 1.00243902439 1496% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 965.302439024 179% => OK
No of words: 337.0 196.424390244 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12462908012 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70801063385 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 106.607317073 186% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587537091988 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0781543544 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.35 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.85 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225103218355 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058148594835 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664872949506 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14645060726 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749436674673 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 40.7170731707 233% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.