Technology has revolutionized human interactions in last few decades. Communication by using digital methods has replaced face to face meetings on commercial as well as personal levels. This development, although welcomed passionately, has significantly impacted security and business and personal networking.
One huge benefit of using technology to communicate is that it is efficient and time saving. Connecting with friends or business clients face to face is time consuming and takes a lot of effort especially while commuting to reach the place of meeting. However, by using social media websites like skype, facebook and whatsApp, this hassle can be avoided altogether. Also, since consumers can access these sites by just clicking a button on their smart phones, technology has also given business owners an opportunity to boost their chances of marketing. All major brands have now social media presence to facilitate their customers without making them visit outlets for even minor complaints. Walmart, for instance, has its online complaint center where buyers can talk to its customer service representatives any time of the day. Similarly, individuals can now talk to their friends living far away without the trouble of going out of station or country. Moreover, it is easier to follow up old peers and clients as the whole world is connected through sophisticated technology.
On the other hand, excessive use of digital methods has made humans vulnerable to privacy invasion. Many social media sites sell consumer data to various governments and organizations for money and this is a major security threat. Moreover, hacking is rampant in online world and confidential information often gets stolen. Large companies use these notorious ways to damage the business of their competitors. On individual levels, private data from phone is often used to blackmail the victim for personal agendas. For example, two years ago, Facebook was accused of selling data to Pakistani government, which led to arrest of many human rights activists and damage to their rights of free speech.
To conclude, technology has replaced face to face meetings and communication by digital methods is now being significantly preferred. While this method is rapid and convenient, security threats associated with its use can prove dangerous to business professionals as well as individuals. However, if effective legislation is made to control theft or sale of data, technology can prove as an excellent method to enhance human communications in this modern and fast paced world.
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works. 56
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Nowadays a lot of offices are being built an open plan design. Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development?. Discuss your opinion and support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'clients'' or 'client's'?
Suggestion: clients'; client's
...ng. Connecting with friends or business clients face to face is time consuming and take...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1081, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ected through sophisticated technology. On the other hand, excessive use of digi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44862155388 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98366058955 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8515981346 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.7 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.95 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273204881274 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822769450398 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729949018795 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177533252651 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431062047053 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.