There is no doubt that technology has taken over every aspects of our lives including communication. Although it has facilitated the transmission of information in terms of speed and opportunities, it has also threatened existence of face to face interaction as well as made people susceptible to cyber-crimes. This essay will discuss the positive and negative sides of technology for communicating.
Looking firstly at the advantages, technology has engendered unprecedented development in communication sector. One of the most obvious benefits is that owing to the blessings of technology, people can communicate with their loved one’s instantly. In other words, even if anyone lives on the farthest corner of the planet, with the aid of technology, they can connect with their dearest persons at any given moment. For instance, prevalence of video chatting has enabled people not only to transfer audios but also to share live videos at the same time regardless of the geographical barriers. In contrast, face to face communication requires someone to be physically present for exchange of conversation, which is often not possible if the other person is living overseas. Therefore, it is quite evident that technology has brought people just one click away regarding communication.
Nevertheless, technology based communication is not exempt from drawbacks. Firstly, our everyday life is being supplanted by the virtual communication network of technology. This is because majority of the people are becoming so much obsessed with technology that they have cut themselves off the surroundings, which is hampering their social relationship to a great extent. To make matters worse, since they resort to online communication rather than direct interaction with a person, they suffer from loneliness; thus, ultimately falling prey to depression. Unlike face to face communication, virtual conversation can never replace the joy and pleasure that is associated with realistic confabulation. Secondly, people can be targeted by cyber criminals in online communication methods. To clarify, cyber offenders can gain access to confidential or personal information, which can be used to blackmail someone. Consequently, this could result in defamation of the victim’s reputation and status.
In conclusion, while technology has bestowed superfast communication and other conveniences upon us, it has also lessened social interaction among people and made people vulnerable to cyber-crimes.
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage more people 78
- In many countries woman no longer feel the need to get married Some people believe that this is because woman are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring To what extent do you agree or disa 83
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming To what extent do you agree 92
- In nearly all science courses at university there are significantly more male students than female students What is the reason for this What could be done to balance out the numbers 87
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as well as, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73854447439 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34526650231 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592991913747 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4133224368 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.277777778 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253235369698 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792702127073 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475202519605 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149990226119 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360200494519 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as well as, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73854447439 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34526650231 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592991913747 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4133224368 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.277777778 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253235369698 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792702127073 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475202519605 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149990226119 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360200494519 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.