There are many people nowadays going to find out the history of the places they have been living in. It is various excuses and researching ways that I suppose to.
The most seemingly reason to explain this trend is the imitation for the crowd. A lot of people are now starting to search for the history of their houses or buildings and then upload pictures on social media as their imperative milestones. Young people, who see those, are also curious about the past period of theirs, so they determine to figure it out. The possibly second reason is to explore the hidden value of their shelters in order to sell them with higher prices, or merely have some more gratitude on their accommodations by acknowledging and appreciating them throughout the research. Subsequently, people are bored in contemporary lifetime. That is why they tend to explore several obscure habits beyond the phone's screen, which are probably weird or mysterious but amaze them in normal days. Taking the Covid-19 quarantine scenario as an example, everyone has isolated themselves for days. This is a good chance to look for the history of which they have settled down. If they are lucky, they may see the precious information that their homes or buildings attain.
There are tremendous ways to learn about the accommodation history. Initially, going to the library for reading relevant books is a great choice. Another manner is to ask to specialised staff at the local libraries about the history of our area. The last but not the least tool is searching the Internet for ample responses. This is considered as the most efficient and splendid way to answer any inquiries for any themes.
To deduce this essay, I assume that everyone might be willing to know about the story of their shelters by many purposes and manners as aforementioned.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar canes Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In the past most families ate together in the evening and the food was almost always cooked at home Nowadays however many families rarely eat together every day and often the food is bought outside the house or supplied by catering What are the reaso 89
- some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the internet and that governments should provide this access for free other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services discuss both 89
- The diagram shows the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...ative milestones. Young people, who see those ones, are also curious about the past period...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...t the history of our area. The last but not least tool is searching the Internet for ampl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, second, so, then, i suppose
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91558441558 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64248218407 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600649350649 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2499402588 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0588235294 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321737681465 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832535514533 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537962945162 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162419768028 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765694844557 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.