More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.
Today, the number of parents allowing their children to spend time on computers and tablets is increasing as they believe that it is better for children to develop technology skills. It cannot be denied that, in today’s world where even the most human-needed fields such as law sector are threatened to lose their human resources to artificial intelligence, it would be lucrative to be familiar with technology. During the earlier childhood, it is proven that developing a particular skill is far easier when compared to the later times. Accordingly, children are able to learn technological skills quicker and easier than the older ones. Also, the more they exposed to technology the better they become at using it. For instance, it is more likely nowadays to encounter with a baby switching from one YouTube video to another effortlessly as it is already a natural habit. These children will face no challenge when they get into business life. Because today technology related jobs are becoming more and more common and there ara plenty of space for tech-lovers. Also, they even can earn huge amount of money in their childhood and be hailed as superheroes by detecting a gap in the softwares of tech-giants. Additionally, in every job being acquired basic technology skills such as being able to deal with the most common computer programs like Excel and Word is one of the top requirements of human resources professionals.
Along with all these advantages of allowing infants to learn technology skills during their play with computers and tablets, we cannot ignore the hazardous consequences of this technology surrounded life. Technological devices are excellent for distraction and entertainment and they make especially children to stick to them. As a result, children lack social skills as they too much contaminated with computer games and videos. Psychiatrists are constantly warning parents about controlling the screen time of children. Moreover, they are stating that children’s exposure to technological devices earlier from a certain age block their normal physical and psychological development. Accordingly, children cannot learn how to balance their emotions or worse they cannot gain positive attitudes in life; since it has been proven by researches that video games and videos induce negative and aggressive emotions in children’s brains.
Taking into account both the advantages and disadvantages of allowing children to use computers and tablets, answering the question on whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages depends on a certain preference: raising individuals with healthy characteristics or promising technology skills. In my opinion, the latter is more important for a happy living regardless of how technology centered the world is.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | OezenEC | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | OezenEC | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | laflordestambul | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | laflordestambul | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Allen_1237 | 61 | view |
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages. 56
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, moreover, so, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48611111111 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0969107965 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546296296296 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8914408591 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401606617885 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122808842608 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831822183044 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264103404269 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351325286812 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.