More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone?
Cities are often seen as places of opportunity, but there are also some major drawbacks of living in a large metropolis. In my opinions, governments could do much more to improve city life for the average inhabitant.
The main problem for anyone who hopes to migrate to large city is that the cost of living likely to be much higher than it is in a small town or village. Inhabitants of city have to pay higher prices for housing, transport, and even food. Another issue is that urban areas tend to suffer from social problems such as high crime and poverty rates in comparison with rural areas. Furthermore, the air quality in cities is often poor, due to pollution from traffic, and the streets and public transport systems are usually overcrowded. As a result, city life can be unhealthy and stressful.
However, there are various steps that governments could take to tackle these problems. Firstly, they could invest money in the building of affordable or social housings to reduce the cost of living. Secondly, politicians have the power to ban vehicles from city centers and promote the use of cleaner public transport, which would help to reduce both air pollution and traffic congestion. In London, for example, the introduction of a congestion charge for drivers has helped to curb the traffic problem. A third option would be to develop provincial, town and rural area, by moving industry and jobs to those regions, in order to reduce the pressure on major city.
In conclusion, Government could certainly implement a range of measures to enhance the quality of life for all city residents
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Garrett | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Garrett | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | MotiurRahman | 78 | view |
- The table above compares the percentage of children with different educational problems in school A and school B in 2005 and 2015.It is clear from the table that the total percentage of students who were lack of educational abilities of school B was small 67
- The line chart above compares the difference in the consumption of the four types of boneless meat of four different species per capita.It is clear that there were significant changes in the choice of meat in the US from 1955 to 2012. In general, beef and 78
- The bar chart shows information about people’s drinking behavior by age group in the US. Severaltrends areevident.The highest proportion of those who never drink (nearly two-thirds) was in the 16 to 24 yearsgroup. The proportion tended to decrease with 56
- The pie charts compare home ownership and renting for 1991 and 2007 in percentage terms. In 1991,home owner were the most popular type of housing, accounting for 60%, or more than over half of allhomes. The next largest sector was social rented homes, amo 78
- It is clear that there’s extreme contrary in the variations of the two values over the first decade of the 21st century. While more and more money was spent on cell phone service, landline phone, on the other hand, shows a tendency of steady decrease.Th 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92250922509 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64498179666 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.571912329 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.615384615 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261380195543 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948917789042 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919570963158 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171613118294 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690020539866 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.