It is true that cities are seen as places of opportunity, but there are several major drawbacks of living in a large metropolis. The following essays will discuss the difficulties of city life and measures that government could take to mitigate the situations.
As an increasing number of people are migrating to cities, several related problems can be anticipated. Firstly, the main issue is that low-income people can not afford a high cost of living. This is because more people migrate to cities for finding decent jobs, there is an increasing demand for housing, which leads to a rise in the cost of accommodation that not everyone can handle. A further problem will include poor drainage systems. It is clearly noticed that many rundown areas are drawn on rainy days, which causes an increasing percentage of accidents and damages for flooded houses.
However, some effective measures could be implemented to alleviate the problems described above. Firstly, a simple solution would be to invest more money in the building of industrial areas on the outskirts of cities. It is believed that such a measure will create a myriad of jobs for rural inhabitants, which results in a better income to support their lives and a decrease in migrants to the city. A second measure would be for governments to upgrade drainage systems. This action involves repairing and reinforcing infrastructure facilities, such as roads and systems of watercourses in areas normally affected by rain, flood, and tide. As a result, a low percentage of accidents and increasing living standards are expected.
In conclusion, high-cost living and poor drainage systems are two primary reasons contributing to several difficulties of living in a sprawling city. Fortunately, there are various effective solutions for government to take to tackle these issues, which results in enhancing the quality of life for all the city residents.
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations 67
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 67
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22077922078 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.921549375 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538961038961 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4897042115 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296398301629 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851951246875 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068347825564 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172869922278 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393807848337 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.