More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development?
It is clear that there is a dramatical increase of tiny houses without outdoor areas that is affordable for most of people living in developing mega-cities. Although small flats are suitable to finance for most of citizen in urban sectors, I firmly agree that there are several negative impacts to health and life of humanity in the future.
Living in cramped houses causes numberous backdraws for people’s health, including physical health and mental health. Speaking of physical health, sleeping in small rooms is one of reasons that affects directly to sustainability of human’s skeleton, especially spine. To be specific, there is much space for a comfortable bed in a tiny room. This leads to incorrect postures that causes some serious problems for bone development of human, especially children and senior citizens. In additional, one’s emotional development can meet a great deal of issues if one lives in an enclosed space that is no outdoor areas. For example, situation of people who have psychological disorders will usually get worse if they stay in a room without windows or enlarged spaces.
In another case, dwelling in crowded homes is one of causes that is continually killing human’s life. According to current researches initiated by non profit organizations about behavioural psychology, people who live in small houses tend to isolate themselve in our own places after working time at workplaces more than people who live in places that are larger. As a consequence, those seem no longer to keep in touch with their friends, even their neighbours. This gives rise to concerns about excessive insensitivity in human society.
In conclusion, while it is undeniable that the rise of small flats addressed the issues of population boom and residence for migrants from rural areas to urban areas, there are vast of negative outcomes that influence directly to humanity development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-29 | Huỳnh Trí | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Nguyen Thuy Anh | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | unknownabc | 79 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | Baonguyenqn3011 | 92 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 89 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The consumption of the world s resources oil and water etc is increasing at a dangerous rate What are causes and solutions 71
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the1990s. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ut outdoor areas that is affordable for most of people living in developing mega-cities. Altho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... additional, one’s emotional development can meet a great deal of issues if one l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28196721311 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85728628657 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.254388389 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.923076923 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222336571536 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662612218034 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506266300843 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122465349198 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312995234825 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.