More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is a negative or positive development

Essay topics:

More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development?

There are more residents in the urban area who settle down in homes with limited capacity or no open air-places. From my perspective, living in narrow spaces limits citizens' possibilities in many ways for some following reasons.
Beginning with, accommodating in tiny homes takes disadvantages for many people. Firstly, it makes people live inconveniently. Everyone wants to stay at homes with big rooms, gardens and many others. It is also beneficial for inhabitants' health, while it can make the air fresher. For example, to save space as much as possible, people usually combine rooms like the living room with the kitchen or restroom with a dishwashing place. It affects seriously on physical strength of family members, especially in respiratory system. Some cases have been recorded poisoning with gas, and also some infectious diseases like malaria and others.
Moreover, living with too many neighbors is also annoying. Disturbing other people is a popular issue, it is influential on the feelings of many inhabitants. For instance, after working hard for an entire day, people need to rest. However, the next door makes noises and even some strange smells emit, it causes disappointment for many people. Besides, moving is also the persistent problem with citizens when the road is extremely slight to move, traffic jams nearly emerges every day. Additionally, when having some heavy rains, residences are easily flooded because of the undeveloped drainage system. It affects many house facilities like electronic devices, crops, and the others.
In conclusion, settling down in narrow residences and also without outdoor areas is unbeneficial for many people, it declines resident potential in many ways, it should have some measures to enhance tight areas.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-29 Huỳnh Trí 84 view
2022-08-04 Nguyen Thuy Anh 89 view
2022-06-05 unknownabc 79 view
2021-01-15 Baonguyenqn3011 92 view
2020-03-11 nguyenduchuy2705 89 view
Essays by user unknownabc :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, while, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40794223827 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79549686949 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646209386282 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4374745056 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1176470588 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16380189453 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549377276067 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568827876602 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108912121126 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623371963986 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.