More and more people want to own famous brands of cars, clothes and other items. What are the reasons for this? Is this a negative or positive trend?
These days, there are an increasing number of people purchasing high-end products. This trend happens for some reason and I believe that it is a negative development.
To begin with, the tendency to possess high-ranking products is caused by some factors. First of all, since people are getting wealthier, they tend to present their prosperity and social status in order to get others’ respect as well as admiration. To illustrate celebrities often wear luxurious clothes at social events so that they can have a good impression on others. Secondly, top brands offer high-quality items, which enable customers to use these leading products within a long time. As a result, they can save a great deal of money spent on new ones. Finally, people might be affected by peer pressure. In fact, no one wants to be inferior to their friends, so they usually follow fashion trends even when high-end items are quite expensive.
However, there are several reasons why the disadvantages of growing consumption of brand-name products outweigh the advantages. One of the primary reasons is that this tendency can lead to people's burden of debt. For example, although the high-end items are usually lavish, some people try to borrow money to possess them. Consequently, they own a large amount of money and might put their future financial security at risk. Additionally, in terms of society, this tendency can cause the development of materialism. In other words, people may focus more on luxurious products such as clothes or cars than spiritual and moral value values, including kindness and sincerity.
In conclusion, people tend to purchase luxurious items due to the wish to show their wealth and social status, the high quality of these products and peer pressure. At the same time, I believe this is a negative trend as it contributes to the burden of debt and the growth of materialism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-10 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Pau Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | kchocielts | 81 | view |
| 2020-08-11 | aidaaaa | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-14 | tda | 78 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree 43
- Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to these places historical attractions 78
- It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks Do you agree or disagree 67
- The table shows data about the proportion of consumer expenditure on different items in five countries in 2002 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...asons is that this tendency can lead to peoples burden of debt. For example, although t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07073954984 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75072445814 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585209003215 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2959926596 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7647058824 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2352941176 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2610783858 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764571879825 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690528343041 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168872258875 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684799665936 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.