Under the background that the development of information technology has changed our life and society significantly these y ears, tele-work is becoming a more and more noticeable trend. While there are some advantages of working in the office, I do believe that working from home is more beneficial compared to working at office.
On one hand, there are several reasons why people disagree to work at home. Employers have more freedom at home, which resulting in low efficiency of working. By contrast, working with leaders and colleges will give pressure to workers. What’s more, lack of communication are more likely to produce the feeling of loneliness if people work at home for a long period of time. Telecommuting workers can’t build the connection with people and teams in the industry.
On the other hand, tele-work benefits not only individuals, but also companies and society. Firstly, the new type of working provides a more flexible method which can save numerous time and money on transportation. According to a recent survey, it takes workers in Beijing average 2 hours to commute every day. While working at home, employers could spend more time on their own hobbies. Secondly, the budget of renting office and other expenses decreases a lot for enterprisers. Finally, it will reduce the possibility of traffic congestion, especially during rush hours and the air pollution by less consumption of fossil fuels.
After having discussed the most pertinent points of issues, I’m convinced that the advantages of tele-work outweighs its disadvantages, considering the benefits brought to employers, companies and city transportation.
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology Do you think it is positive or negative development 84
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for commiting it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment 61
- The graph below shows Long-Term International Migration in UK, 1999-2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- It is generally accepted that families are not as closed as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. 11
- In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could. Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly these y ears, tele-work is becoming a more and more noticeable trend. While t...
^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...iness if people work at home for a long period of time. Telecommuting workers can't build...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41538461538 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01569857078 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642307692308 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7470115597 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311175300976 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976757599185 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832676711721 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175317472713 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117428304904 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.