People hold different views about whether the type of crime could depend on the punishments or we should consider various conditions and motivation of each crime. While there are several reasons to support the fixed punishments, I do believe that a flexible arrangement will be more reasonable.
On one hand, some people argued that the law should treat every citizen equally. As a result, the punishments of the same type of crime are supposed to be fixed. Moreover, if the judge gives different sentences to one kind of crime, it may be result in dirty bribe which want to make an influence on the judgment.
On the other hand, other people see this issue in a different way. Firstly, the bribe is the problem about government management, not about the law. Secondly, the Police departments punish people because of wrong things they have done, so that they could change their behaviors. The society are looking forward that they will devote theirselves to contribute societies. That's why we need to consider their different and complicated circumstances and why they make the crime. Finally, the harm of crime doesn't depend on their type, but on their seriousness. For example, there are two thieves. One has stole 200 yuan, while another has stolen 2000 yuan. How can you say they are supposed to receive the same punishment.
After having discussed the most pertinent points of this issue, I feel the only logical conclusion is that we should think respective conditions and backgrounds of each criminal to decide what punishment to make even if the types are the same.
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology. DO you think it is positive or negative development? 61
- The graph below shows Long-Term International Migration in UK, 1999-2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows Long-Term International Migration in UK, 1999-2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- It is generally accepted that families are not as close as they used to be.Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. 11
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...other hand, other people see this issue in a different way. Firstly, the bribe is the problem abou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...te theirselves to contribute societies. Thats why we need to consider their different...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e the crime. Finally, the harm of crime doesnt depend on their type, but on their seri...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'stolen'.
Suggestion: stolen
...example, there are two thieves. One has stole 200 yuan, while another has stolen 2000...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ditions and backgrounds of each criminal to decide what punishment to make even i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i feel, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97735849057 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62985569479 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7830242852 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292978310736 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847130316085 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798446039641 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184809299287 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794358293902 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.