More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why do young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities?
An increasing number of young people in developed nations are doing volunteer work to support less wealthy countries in their free time. In this essay, I will discuss the factors that contribute to this trend and whether it is more beneficial to the volunteers or the recipient communities.
There are several reasons why teenagers and young adults in developed nations are spending time for goodwill activities, one of which may be the increased awareness on current world issues among people. With the rise of social media platforms, a lot of information about the situation of people from poorer corners of the world has been made available to the youth, which is also the main user group of these platforms. Having noticed the struggles of people from different countries, young adults may become more motivated to help others through small teaching and building projects. Recognition appears to be another factor that encourages young people to opt for unpaid activities, which is vital for high school students preparing for college application. Volunteer extracurriculars are a great way to catch the attention of the admission board, because the participants can demonstrate kindness, empathy, as well as leadership and time-management skills. It has been reported that CVs that contain unpaid work have an increased 34% chance of being selected compared to those that do not.
The positive effects of goodwill unpaid work on communities in poorer nations are undeniable. However, I believe that young people are more likely to reap the benefits after these activities. Often, the scale of volunteer projects may not be enough to create a long-lasting impact on poorer nations. Free language courses for children in need, for example, can only help them understand the basics, which may not be of much help for them in the long run. For students, however, doing volunteer activities can help them gain valuable skills such as event management and teamwork that may be helpful for them in their future careers. Furthermore, as mentioned in the previous paragraph, the certification from these extracurriculars can also be beneficial for them when applying for scholarships or universities.
In conclusion, increased awareness and recognition are two main reasons for the increased number of young people in wealthy countries doing unpaid work to support poorer nations. Although the positive impacts of these projects on the communities are apparent, young people are more likely to benefit from them eventually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-04 | quynhanhbuiviet | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-12 | gaurav2492 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | mohsina | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-08 | Zahra5604 | 75 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | quynhdieu | 78 | view |
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries Why do young people choose to do so Who will benefit more young people or the communities 73
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons for this What problems does this cause 78
- The chart below shows the number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1037, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontain unpaid work have an increased 34% chance of being selected compared to tho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34335839599 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90841088942 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516290726817 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6263157652 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383745822624 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130237387166 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951080761341 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276028453046 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092611256338 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1037, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontain unpaid work have an increased 34% chance of being selected compared to tho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34335839599 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90841088942 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516290726817 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6263157652 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383745822624 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130237387166 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951080761341 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276028453046 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092611256338 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.