More big shopping malls are being built and replace small shops. Is this a positive or negative development?
There are currently a great number of big shopping malls in term of replacing small shops. While this trend can be positive to some extent, I would argue that it is more negative.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why more clear large malls that are being constructed. Firstly, a significant increase in need of buying brand new goods in recent years. As a result, there are more spacious sites to display these types of goods and attract more clients that are available to spend more money on them. If there no big shopping malls, customers do not have more options to choose. Secondly, with a large number of goods having the same functions, which often causes the big reduction of price. Therefore, consumers could pay less money to own a product. For instance, customers could choose to buy a washing machine that is manufactured by Panasonic due to its cheaper price instead of Samsung.
On the other hand, small shops have more valuable advantages. Firstly, nowadays people from big cities such as Sai Gon or Ha Noi have to work more time. As a result, after long working hours, they quickly need to buy some types of foods from convenient shops that are near their homes to prepare for dinner. This causes time-saving for commuters. For instance, it takes about 15 minutes for my wife to purchase foods for dinner from Seven Eleven shop near our location. Secondly, the chains of convenient shops open 24 hours a day. Therefore, they help to satisfy the needs of customers whenever. If there no the chains of small shops such as Circle K and K-Mart, people often have troubles in buying foods in the evening. Finally, a considerable increase in the number chains of convenient shops that help to hire more laborers working at night shifts. This leads to the reduction of the rate unemployment in the economy. For instance, students could earn more money for their tuition fees with a job at a small shop.
In conclusion, while this tendency has some clear benefits for customers, I believe that small shops’ advantages are greater.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | nguyennhathuy | 56 | view |
- Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write.To what extent do you agree or disagree? -2 67
- How an island changed after facilities was built for tourism 78
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people’s behavior. What is your opinion? 73
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unaid work such as teaching and building houses for communities in poorer countries. What are the reasons for this? Who benefits more from this, the cummunities or these you 84
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one's own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... more options to choose. Secondly, with a large number of goods having the same functions, which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...e needs of customers whenever. If there no the chains of small shops such as Circl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79154929577 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49679183163 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538028169014 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1227097351 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52380952381 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293187599876 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891511455582 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833061989366 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216354891371 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125205495211 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.