Cinema attendance by age group
TThe line graph compares the percentages of cinema-going in 4 different age groups in Great Britain between 1984 and 2000.
It is clear that the percentage of people in 15-24 age group attended cinema was by far highest during the period research. Additionally, the figures for people attending cinema also experienced significant increases at the same time.
In 1984, around 18% of people in 15-24 age group went to the cinema, which was highest. While the percentage of people aged 7-14 made up 10%, compared to nearly 5% of cinema attendees who were 25-35. Meanwhile, the proportion of people in 25 and over age group attended cinema was lowest, at roughly 2%.
In 2000, there was a dramatic increase in 15-24 age group of cinema-goers to approximately 55% and remained the highest point, while the figure for people aged 25-35 rose gradually to around 15%. At the same time, the proportions for the remaining groups also rose significantly to 30%, which were at the same level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | Zahid6400 | 56 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | Sajib Ahamed | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 70 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | vuongthaolinh | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 69
- In some countries secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects In others children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today s world 72
- Holiday accommodation chosen by the British in 2010 91
- The bar chart compares consumer spending on six different items in Germany, Italy, France, and Britain. 67
- There have been many inventions in human history, such as the wheel. Some people think the most important thing is the internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94578313253 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72124510409 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9622157892 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464431738801 0.215688989381 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248819852099 0.103423049105 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115134372823 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326821777152 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899517911152 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.